Lev Trotsky as a hero of the revolutionary-biographical film narrative: Versions of Russian and German documentary authors

Authors

  • Александр Алексеевич Пронин St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu09.2018.211

Abstract

The article presents a comparative analysis with narratological positions of two documentary films about L. Trotsky produced in Russia and Germany. It reveals the interrelation of structural and cognitive aspects of the nonfiction film text, particular implementation of the principle of polyphonic narration, and narrative strategies of an author. The only the dihegic narrator is a grandson Vsevolod (Esteban) Volkov, who was a real witness of the last years of the life of Trotsky. In the Russian film he acts not only as an eyewitness to two assassination attempts on the grandfather, but as a hero, a survivor at 14 years of a drama that operates on the viewer (“narrative of emotions”). In the German film, the authors deliberately did not focus on this character, E. Volkov appears only three times, his narrative statements are informative, but not psychologically expanded, and therefore “poorer” in the cognitive terms. However, in the German film, the through-line is quotations from the memoirs and journalistic texts of Trotsky and two chronicle cinema citations. In both cases, the non-dihegic narrators are the author and the characters who retell the information from different sources: Russian, German, French, Mexican, and Ukrainian experts-historians or publicists. In both films, the author is more active as a narrator than character-experts who often assesses, rather than just retells, certain events in the history of the hero. The differences in the implementation of the author’s intention are explained by the cognitive factors: the story of the hero in the Russian film is told more emotionally because the hero, as he emphases the dihegic narrator-character, appears more human; in the German cinema narrative about Trotsky, the events themselves and the modern European point of view are presented.

Keywords:

documentary, narrative, author, strategy, cognition, L. Trotsky

Downloads

 

References

Литература

Бугаева 2012 — Бугаева Л. Д. “Нарратив, медиа и эмоции”. Русский след в нарратологии: материалы Междунар. науч.-практич. конф. (Балашов, 26–28 ноября 2012). Балашов: Николаев, 2012. С. 12–16.

Бугаева 2013 — Бугаева Л. Д. “Кино как модель сознания: Пия Тикка”. Международный журнал исследователей культуры. 10, 1, 2013: 122–125.

Женетт 1998 — Женетт Ж. “Повествовательный дискурс”. Перцов Н. (пер.). Женетт Ж. Фигуры: в 2 т. Т. 2. М.: Изд-во им. Сабашниковых, 1998. С. 60–280.

Михалкович 1986 — Михалкович В. И. Изобразительный язык средств массовой коммуникации. М.: Наука, 1986. 222 с.

Пронин 2016 — Пронин А. А. Телевидение как рассказчик: биографический нарратив в современной документалистике. СПб.: Петрополис, 2016. 172 с.

Herman 2002 — Herman D. Story Logic: Problems and Possibilities of Narrative. Lincoln (Neb.); London: University of Nebraska Press, 2002. 478 p.

Herman 2008 — Herman D. “Description, Narrative and Explanation: Text-type Categories and the Cognitive Foundations of Discourse Competence”. Poetics Today. 29, 3, 2008: 437–472.


References

Бугаева 2012 — Bugaeva L. D. “Narrativ, media i emotsii [Narrative, Media and Emotions]”. Russkii sled v narratologii: materialy Mezhdunar. nauch.-praktich. konf. (Balashov, 26–28 noiabria 2012) [The Russian Trace within Narratology: Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference (Balashov, November 26–28, 2012)]. Balashov: Nikolaev Publ., 2012, pp. 12–16. (In Russian)

Бугаева 2013 — Bugaeva L. D. “Kino kak model’ soznaniia: Piia Tikka [Cinema as a Model of Consciousness: Pia Tikka]”. Mezhdunarodnyi zhurnal issledovatelei kultury [International Journal of Cultural Research]. 10, 1, 2013: 122–125. (In Russian)

Женетт 1998 — Genette G. “Discours du récit”. Genette G. Figure III. Paris: Seuil, 1972, pp. 65–278. (Russ. ed.: Zhenett Zh. “Povestvovatel’nyi diskurs [Narrative Discourse]”. Pertsov N. (transl.). Genette G. Figury [Figures]: in 2 vols. Vol. 2. Moscow: Sabashnikovykh Publ., 1998, pp. 60–280.) (Transl. from French to Russian)

Михалкович 1986 — Mikhalkovich V. I. Izobrazitel’nyi iazyk sredstv massovoi kommunikatsii [Fine Language of Mass Communication]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 1986. 222 p. (In Russian)

Пронин 2016 — Pronin A. A. Televidenie kak rasskazchik: biograficheskii narrativ v sovremennoi dokumentalistike [Television as a Narrator: a Biographical Narrative in Modern Documentary]. St. Petersburg: Petropolis Publ., 2016. 172 p. (In Russian)

Herman 2002 — Herman D. Story Logic: Problems and Possibilities of Narrative. Lincoln (Neb.); London: University of Nebraska Press, 2002. 478 p.

Herman 2008 — Herman D. “Description, Narrative and Explanation: Text-type Categories and the Cognitive Foundations of Discourse Competence”. Poetics Today. 29, 3, 2008: 437–472.

Published

2018-06-29

How to Cite

Пронин, А. А. (2018). Lev Trotsky as a hero of the revolutionary-biographical film narrative: Versions of Russian and German documentary authors. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Language and Literature, 15(2), 289–299. https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu09.2018.211

Issue

Section

Journalism