The prospective in Spanish: Forms, semantics, pragmatics (part 2)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu09.2022.104Abstract
Based on corpus data, the paper discusses three Spanish infinitive constructions with prospective meaning: two constructions with the verb of location estar and one with the verb of movement ir: , and . A new approach is applied that views these constructions as a means of expressing the grammeme of the prospective in Spanish. The first part of the article contains an overview of the results of a corpus study of all three constructions, which aims to clarify both diachronic and synchronic issues of the simultaneous functioning of three different means of expressing prospective semantics, their frequency, as well as the distribution of each construction in the Spanish-speaking area. The first part also offers a detailed comparative analysis of the semantics of two infinitive constructions with estar. It begins with the establishment of a characteristic restriction for both constructions on filling the infinitive slot with atelic lexemes (which makes them different from the construction with the motion verb) and ends with the proposed interpretations of the semantics of both constructions with the verb of location. The second part of the paper, based on a review of descriptive grammars, theories, and corpus research, discusses the prospective construction with the verb of movement ir, and (based on results of a corpus study of all three constructions) proposes a description of the prospective zone in Spanish from the position of General, i. e. typologically oriented, Morphology, and Grammatical Semantics.
Keywords:
prospective, Spanish, analytical construction, corpus study, semantics
Downloads
References
Баранова 2014 — Баранова В. В. Поди знай, что это значит: конструкция трудновыполнимого действия поди. Aсta Linguistica Petropolitana. Труды института лингвистических исследований. 2014, X (2): 99–120.
Горлова 2016 — Горлова А. А. Гортативные конструкции в русском языке. Aсta Linguistica Petropolitana. Труды института лингвистических исследований. 2016, XII (1): 379–392.
Грайс 1985 — Грайс Г. П. Логика и речевое общение. В кн.: Новое в зарубежной лингвистике. Вып. 16. М.: Прогресс, 1985. С. 217–237.
Козлов 2021 — Козлов А. А. К семантической типологии проспектива. Вопросы языкознания. 2021, (2): 28–52.
Кошелев 2016 — Кошелев А. Д. О структурном и генетическом сходстве лексических и грамматических значений (когнитивный анализ переходности и залога). Известия РАН. Серия литературы и языка. 2016, 75 (3): 19–39.
Майсак 2005 — Майсак Т. А. Типология грамматикализации конструкций с глаголами движения и глаголами позиции. М.: Языки славянских культур, 2005.
Маслов 2004 — Маслов Ю. С. Избранные труды. Аспектология. Общее языкознание. М.: Языки славянских культур, 2004.
Плунгян 2011 — Плунгян В. А. Введение в грамматическую семантику: грамматические значения и грамматические системы языков мира. М.: Издат. центр РГГУ, 2011.
Рассудова 1968 — Рассудова О. П. Употребление видов глагола в русском языке. М.: Изд-во Моск. гос. ун-та, 1968.
Bellosta von Kolbe 2001 — Bellosta von Colbe V. Optimale Wortstellung. Direktes und indirektes Objekt im Spanischen. Thesis for PhD in Philological Sciences. Köln, 2001. http://kups.ub.uni-koeln.de/1492/ (дата обращения: 21.03.2020).
Bravo 2008 — Bravo A. M. y los tiempos compuestos: semejanzas y diferencias. La prospectividad y el paradigma temporal y aspectual del español. In: Tiempos compuestos y formas verbales complejas. Lingüística Iberoamericana, 34. Carrasco Gutiérrez A. (ed.). Madrid: Vervuert, 2008. P. 403–442. (На исп. яз.)
Bravo Martín 2008 — Bravo Martín A. La perífrasis “ir a + infinitivo” en el sistema temporal y aspectual del español. Memoria para optar al grado de doctor. Madrid, 2008. (На исп. яз.)
Bybee, Dahl 1989 — Bybee J., Dahl Ö. The creation of tense and aspect systems in the languages of the World. Studies in Language. 1989, 13 (1): 51–103.
Bybee et al. 1994 — Bybee J., Perkins R. D., Pagliuca W. The Evolution of Grammar. Tense, Aspect and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago; London: The University of Chicago Press, 1994.
Cartagena 1999 — Cartagena N. Los tiempos compuestos. In: Gramática Descriptiva. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe, 1999. P. 2935–2975. (На исп. яз.)
Fernández de Castro 1999 — Fernández de Castro F. Las perífrasis verbales en el español actual. Madrid: Gredos, 1999. (На исп. яз.)
Gómez Torrego 1999 — Gómez Torrego L. Los verbos auxiliares. Las perífrasis verbales de infinitivo. In: Gramática Descriptiva. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe, 1999. P. 3323–3390. (На исп. яз.)
Kuteva 1998 — Kuteva T. On identifying an evasive gram: action narrowly averted. Studies in Language. 1998, 22 (1): 113–160.
Nueva gramática 2009 — Nueva gramática de la lengua española. Morfología. Sintaxis I. Sintaxis II. RAE. Madrid: Espasa Libros, 2009. (На исп. яз.)
Sáez-Godoy 1968 — Sáez-Godoy L. Algunas observaciones sobre la expresión del futuro en español. In: Acta del XI Congreso Internacional de Lingüística y Filología Románicas, IV, Madrid: C. S. I. C, 1968. P. 1889–1968. (На исп. яз.)
Topor 2011 — Topor M. Perífrasis verbales del español y rumano. Un estudio contrastivo. PhD. Universitat de Lleida, 2011. http://www.tesisenred.net/handle/10803/31989 (дата обращения: 22.02.2017). (На исп. яз.)
Veyrat Rigat 1992 — Veyrat Rigat M. Para una clasificación automática de la perífrasis Ir a + Infinitivo. In: Lenguajes Naturales y Lenguajes Formales. 1992, (8): 657–664. (На исп. яз.)
Veyrat Rigat 1993 — Veyrat Rigat M. Aspecto, Perífrasis y Auxiliación: un enfoque perceptivo. Valencia: Universitat de Valencia, 1993. (На исп. яз.)
Баранова 2014 — Baranova V.V. Podi znaj, chto eto znachit: construction of unrealizable action podi. Acta linguistica Petropolitana. Trudy instituta lingvisticheskikh issledovanii. 2014, X (2): 99–120. (In Russian)
Горлова 2016 — Gorlova А.А. Hortative constructions in Russian. Acta linguistica Petropolitana. Trudy instituta lingvisticheskikh issledovanii. 2016, XII (1): 379–392. (In Russian)
Грайс 1985 — Grice H.P. Logic and Conversation. In: Novoe v zarubezhnoi lingvistike. Iss. 16. Moscow: Progress Publ., 1985: 217–237. (In Russian)
Козлов 2021 — Kozlov А.А. Towards the semantic typology of prospective aspect. Voprosy iazykoznaniia. 2021, (2): 28–52. (In Russian)
Кошелев 2016 — Koshelev A.D. On Structural and Genetic Similarities of Lexical and Grammatical Meanings (a Cognitive Analisis of Verb Transitivity and Voice). Izvestiia Rossiiskoi Akademii Nauk. Seriia literatury i iazyka. 2016, 75 (3): 19–39. (In Russian)
Майсак 2005 — Maisak T.A. Typology of Grammaticalization of Constructions with Verbs of Movement and Verbs of Position. Moscow: Iazyki slavianskikh kul’tur Publ., 2005. (In Russian)
Mаслов 2004 — Maslov Yu. S. Selected Works. Aspectology. General Linguistics. Moscow: Iazyki slavianskikh kul’tur Publ., 2004. (In Russian)
Плунгян 2011 — Plungian V.A. Introduction to grammatical semantics: grammatical meanings and grammatical systems of the world’s languages. Moscow: Izdatel’skii tsentr Rossiiskogo gosudarstvennogo gumanitarnogo universiteta Publ., 2011. (In Russian)
Рассудова 1968 — Rassudova O.P. The Use of Aspects of verbs in Russian. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta imeni M.V.Lomonosova Publ., 1968. (In Russian)
Bellosta von Kolbe 2001 — Bellosta von Colbe V. Optimale Wortstellung. Direktes und indirektes Objekt im Spanischen. PhD thesis. Köln, 2001. http://kups.ub.uni-koeln.de/1492/ (accessed: 21.03.2020).
Bravo 2008 — Bravo A.M. y los tiempos compuestos: semejanzas y diferencias. La prospectividad y el paradigma temporal y aspectual del español. In: Tiempos compuestos y formas verbales complejas. Lingüística Iberoamericana, 34. Carrasco Gutiérrez A. (ed.). Madrid: Vervuert, 2008. P. 403–442.
Bravo Martín 2008 — Bravo Martín A. La perífrasis “ir a + infinitivo” en el sistema temporal y aspectual del español. Memoria para optar al grado de doctor. Madrid, 2008.
Bybee, Dahl 1989 — Bybee J., Dahl Ö. The creation of tense and aspect systems in the languages of the World. Studies in Language. 1989, 13 (1): 51–103.
Bybee et al. 1994 — Bybee J., Perkins R.D., Pagliuca W. The Evolution of Grammar. Tense, Aspect and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago; London: The University of Chicago Press, 1994.
Cartagena 1999 — Cartagena N. Los tiempos compuestos. In: Gramática Descriptiva. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe, 1999. P. 2935–2975.
Fernández de Castro 1999 — Fernández de Castro F. Las perífrasis verbales en el español actual. Madrid: Gredos, 1999.
Gómez Torrego 1999 — Gómez Torrego L. Los verbos auxiliares. Las perífrasis verbales de infinitivo. In: Gramática Descriptiva. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe, 1999. P. 3323–3390.
Kuteva 1998 — Kuteva T. On identifying an evasive gram: action narrowly averted. Studies in Language. 1998, 22 (1): 113–160.
Nueva gramática 2009 — Nueva gramática de la lengua española. Morfología. Sintaxis I. Sintaxis II. RAE. Madrid: Espasa Libros, 2009.
Sáez-Godoy 1968 — Sáez-Godoy L. Algunas observaciones sobre la expresión del futuro en español. In: Acta del XI Congreso Internacional de Lingüística y Filología Románicas, IV, Madrid: C. S.I.C, 1968. P. 1889–1968.
Topor 2011 — Topor M. Perífrasis verbales del español y rumano. Un estudio contrastivo. PhD. Universitat de Lleida, 2011. http://www.tesisenred.net/handle/10803/31989 (accessed: 22.02.2017).
Veyrat Rigat 1992 — Veyrat Rigat M. Para una clasificación automática de la perífrasis Ir a + Infinitivo. In: Lenguajes Naturales y Lenguajes Formales, 1992, 8. Pp. 657–664.
Veyrat Rigat 1993 — Veyrat Rigat M. Aspecto, Perífrasis y Auxiliación: un enfoque perceptivo. Valencia: Universitat de Valencia, 1993. R
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Articles of "Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Language and Literature" are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.
