The variety of evaluation in communicative practices of academic discourse

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu09.2021.408

Abstract

The article represents a discourse-analytical and corpus study of the evaluation of language as a pragmatic tool in the structure of the professional scientific activity of German linguists. The aim of the work consists in outlining the functional-communicative variety of the evaluation language, depending on the principal task of scientific research, scientific expert and scientific-educational communication practices. The scholarly relevance of the research rests on its incorporation into modern interdisciplinary studies of language resources from the aspect of linguistic pragmatics, interactional sociolinguistics and discourse linguistics, which are directed, on the whole, towards the study of the language and interpretation of the meaning of language signs within the framework of real social contexts while also taking into account a wide range of extralinguistic factors. The novelty of the research is evident in the following results: for the first time, the linguistic variety of evaluations dependent on the general aim of communication practice, which determines the axiological perspective, is considered; a disciplinary correlated classification of evaluation with the allocation of epistemic cognitive, expert and persuasive evaluation is proposed; the essential differences between the selected types of evaluation in the pragmatic categories of author-centricity, normo-centricity and addresseecentricity are substantiated; the text- and discourse-forming part played by language markers of the evaluation category of importance/relevance in profiling and promoting established knowledge in the process of teaching the fundamental theoretical disciplines is revealed. The research material was the German-language corpus of journal articles, scientific reviews and university textbooks on linguistics.

Keywords:

evaluation, academic discourse, epistemic cognitive evaluation, expert evaluation, persuasive evaluation

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Литература

Арутюнова 1988 — Арутюнова Н. Д. Типы языковых значений: Оценка. Событие. Факт. М.: Наука, 1988. 341 с.

Арутюнова 1999 — Арутюнова Н. Д. Оценка в механизмах жизни и языка. В кн.: Арутюнова Н. Д. Язык и мир человека. М.: Языки русской культуры, 1999. С. 130–274.

Баженова 2001 — Баженова Е. А. Научный текст в аспекте политекстуальности. Пермь: Изд-во Перм. гос. ун-та, 2001. 269 c.

Данилевская 2013 — Данилевская Н. В. Об особом статусе оценки в научном тексте. Вестник Пермского государственного университета. 2013, 2 (22): 37–43.

Ильин 1989 — Ильин В. В. Критерии научности знания. М.: Высшая школа, 1989. 127 c.

Котюрова 1988 — Котюрова М. П. Об экстралингвистических основаниях смысловой структуры научного текста. Красноярск: Изд-во Краснояр. ун-та, 1988. 171 c.

Нефедов 2007 — Нефедов С. Т. Коммуникативная модальность и эпистемические модальные компоненты в немецком языке (синхрония и диахрония). Филиппов К. А. (ред.). СПб.: Изд-во С.- Петерб. ун-та, 2007. 199 c.

Нефедов 2017 — Нефедов С. Т. Рестриктивная аргументация: модальные слова сомнения и общезначимости (на материале немецкоязычных лингвистических статей). Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Язык и литература. 2017, 14 (4): 599–610.

Нефедов 2020 — Нефедов С. Т. Социокоммуникативное измерение оценки. Германистика в современном научном пространстве. Материалы VI Международной научно-практической конференции. Краснодар, 2020. С. 122–128.

Нефедов, Чернявская 2020 — Нефедов С. Т., Чернявская В. Е. Контекст в лингвистическом анализе: прагматическая и дискурсивно-аналитическая перспектива. Вестник Томского государственного университета. Филология. 2020, (63): 83–97.

Чернявская 2019 — Чернявская В. Е. Корпусно-ориентированный дискурсивный анализ идентичности российского университета 3,0. Вестник Томского государственного университета. Филология. 2019, (58): 97–114.

Чернявская 2020 — Чернявская В. Е. Метапрагматика коммуникации: когда автор приносит свое значение, а адресат свой контекст. Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Язык и литература. 2020, 17 (1): 135–147.

Чернявская 2021 — Чернявская В. Е. Текст и социальный контекст: Социолингвистический и дис- курсивный анализ смыслопорождения. М.: Ленанд, 2021. 208 c.

Gansel et al. 2019 — Gansel Ch., Nefedov S., Jesan I. Zu Aspekten der Darstellung kommunikativer und sprachlicher Praktiken. In: Kommunikative Praktiken in sozialen Kontexten: Sprachliche Mittel im Einsatz. Gansel Ch., Nefedov S., Jesan I. (Hrsg.). (Reihe: Projekt Angewandte Linguistik. Bd. 3). Münster; Berlin; London: LIT-Verlag. 2019. S. 1–9.

Hood 2010 — Hood S. Appraising Research: Evaluation in Academic Writing. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010. XI + 227 p.

Hunston, Thompson 2003 — Hunston S., Thompson G. Evaluation in Text. Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003. 225 p.

Hyland 2005 — Hyland K. Stance and engagement: a model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies. 2005, 7 (2): 173–192.

Martin, White 2005 — Martin J. R., White P. R. R. The Language of evaluation. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005. XII + 278 p.

Nefedov 2019 — Nefedov S. T. Towards evaluation in scientific reviews (based on German linguistics). Journal of Siberian Federal University — Humanities and Social Sciences. 2019, 12 (10): 1868–1886.

Nefedov 2020 — Nefedov S. T. Wort-, Textsatz- und Diskurssemantik des Lexems Kontext. Sprache & Sprachen. Sonderheft: Deutsch-russische diskursive Zusammenhänge. 2020, (51): 29–42.

Reinhart 2010 — Reinhart M. Peer Review Practices: Epistemic and Social Aspects in the Assessment of Scientific Work. Research Evaluation. 2010, 19 (5): 317–331.

Shaw 2004 — Shaw P. How do we recognize implicit evaluation in academic book reviews? In: Academic Discourse: New Insights into Evaluation. Del Lungo Camiciotti G., Tognini Bonelli E. (eds). Amsterdam: Peter Lang. 2004. P. 121–140.

References

Арутюнова 1988 — Arutiunova N. D. Types of linguistic meaning: Evaluation. Event. Fact. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 1988. 341 p. (In Russian)

Арутюнова 1999 — Arutiunova N. D. Evaluation into the mechanisms of life and language. In: Arutiunova N. D. Iazik i mir cheloveka. Moscow: Iazyki russkoi kultury Publ., 1999. P. 130–274. (In Russian)

Баженова 2001 — Bazhenova E. A. Scientific text in the aspect of polytextuality. Perm: Izdatel’stvo Permskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta Publ., 2001. 269 p. (In Russian)

Данилевская 2013 — Danilevskaia N. V. On the special status of evaluation in a scientific text. Vestnik Permskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2013, 2 (22): 37–43. (In Russian)

Ильин 1989 — Iliin V. V. Criteria for the scientific knowledge: Monograph. Moscow: Vysshaia shkola Publ., 1989. 127 p. (In Russian)

Котюрова 1988 — Kotiurova M. P. Towards extralinguistic foundations of the meaning structure of a scientific text. Krasnoiarsk: Izdatel’stvo Krasnoiarskogo Universiteta Publ., 1988. 171 p. (In Russian)

Нефедов 2007 — Nefedov S. T. Communicative modality and epistemic modal components in German (synchrony and diachrony). Filippov K. A. (ed.). St. Petersburg.: St. Petersburg University Press, 2007. 199 p. (In Russian)

Нефедов 2017 — Nefedov S. T. Restrictive argumentation: modal words of doubt and shared knowledge in academic linguistic writings. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Language and literature. 2017, 14 (4): 599–610. (In Russian)

Нефедов 2020 — Nefedov S. T. Socio-communicative dimension of evaluation. In: Germanistika v sovremennom nauchnom prostranstve. Materialy VI Meshdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii. Krasnodar, 2020. P. 122–128. (In Russian)

Нефедов, Чернявская 2020 — Nefedov S. T., Chernyavskaya V. E. Context in linguistics: Pragmatic and Discourse Analytical Dimensions. Vestnik Tomskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. Filologiia. 2020, (63): 83–97. (In Russian)

Чернявская 2019 — Chernyavskaya V. E. Corpus-Assisted Discourse Analysis of Russian University 3,0 Identity. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologiia. 2019, (58): 97–114. (In Russian)

Чернявская 2020 — Сhernyavskaya V. E. Metapragmatics: When the author brings meaning and the addressee context. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Language and literature. 2020, (1) (17): 135–147. (In Russian)

Чернявская 2021 — Chernyavskaya V. E. Text and social context: Sociolinguistic and discourse analysis of meaning generation. Moscow: Lenand Publ., 2021. 208 p. (In Russian)

Gansel et al. 2019 — Gansel Ch., Nefedov S., Jesan I. Zu Aspekten der Darstellung kommunikativer und sprachlicher Praktiken. In: Kommunikative Praktiken in sozialen Kontexten: Sprachliche Mittel im Einsatz. Gansel Ch., Nefedov S., Jesan I. (Hrsg.). (Reihe: Projekt Angewandte Linguistik. Bd. 3). Münster; Berlin; London: LIT-Verlag. 2019. P. 1–9.

Hood 2010 — Hood S. Appraising Research: Evaluation in Academic Writing. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010. XI + 227 p.

Hunston, Thompson 2003 — Hunston S., Thompson G. Evaluation in Text. Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003. 225 p.

Hyland 2005 — Hyland K. Stance and engagement: a model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies. 2005, 7 (2): 173–192.

Martin, White 2005 — Martin J. R., White P. R. R. The Language of evaluation. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005. XII + 278 p.

Nefedov 2019 — Nefedov S. T. Towards evaluation in scientific reviews (based on German linguistics). Journal of Siberian Federal University — Humanities and Social Sciences. 2019, 12 (10): 1868–1886.

Nefedov 2020 — Nefedov S. T. The word, sentence, text and discourse semantics of the lexeme Kontext ‘context’. Sprache & Sprachen. Sonderheft: Deutsch-russische diskursive Zusammenhänge. 2020, (51): 29–42.

Reinhart 2010 — Reinhart M. Peer Review Practices: Epistemic and Social Aspects in the Assessment of Scientific Work. Research Evaluation. 2010, 19 (5): 317–331.

Shaw 2004 — Shaw P. How do we recognize implicit evaluation in academic book reviews? In: Academic Discourse: New Insights into Evaluation. Del Lungo Camiciotti G., Tognini Bonelli E. (eds). Amsterdam: Peter Lang. 2004. P. 121–140.

Published

2022-02-16

How to Cite

Nefedov, S. T. (2022). The variety of evaluation in communicative practices of academic discourse. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Language and Literature, 18(4), 760–778. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu09.2021.408

Issue

Section

Linguistics