Lexical realizations of hedging: A cross-disciplinary study of  research article abstracts by Russian authors

Olga A.  Boginskaya

doi:10.21638/spbu09.2023.211

Authors

Olga A. Boginskaya Irkutsk National Research Technical University, 83, ul. Lermontova, Irkutsk, 664074, Russia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu09.2023.211

Abstract

Currently, when the English language has established itself as a lingua franca in academic settings, it is relevant to investigate rhetorical strategies in texts produced by L2 writers who use English in their academic prose. This paper explores lexical patterns of hedging in Englishmedium research article abstracts written by L2 (Russian) writers from two fields representing hard sciences and humanities — engineering and linguistics. The main focus is on quantitative and qualitative variations in the lexical realizations of hedging as a metadiscourse strategy used to present research results and enter into a dialogue with the reader. The corpus comprises 312 engineering and linguistics research article abstracts taken equally from six Russian linguistic and engineering journals. In order to investigate hedging devices and their lexical categories, this study adopted the methods of quantitative and qualitative analysis. The results of the quantitative analysis show that there are many differences in the distribution of lexical patterns of hedging in the two sub-corpora. In the engineering abstracts, hedging was most frequently realized through modal auxiliaries and adverbs of frequency. In the linguistics subcorpus, probability nouns and reporting verbs were among the most frequent lexical patterns of hedging. In the linguistics abstracts, hedging was realized through a greater variety of lexical categories. This suggests that lexical realizations of hedging seem to be influenced by the discipline rather than generic conventions.

Keywords:

academic discourse, hedging, metadiscourse

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Berkenkotter, Huckin 1995 — Berkenkotter C., Huckin T.N. Genre Knowledge in Disciplinary Communication: Cognition/Culture/Power. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1995.

Boginskaya 2022 — Boginskaya O. Creating an authorial presence in English-medium research article ab‑stracts by academic writers from different cultural backgrounds. International Journal of Language Studies. 2022, 16 (2): 49–70.

Brown, Levinson 1987 — Brown P., Levinson S. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge University Press, 1987.

Channel 1994 — Channel J. Vague Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.

Chernyavskaya 2010 — Chernyavskaya V.E. Interpretation of the scientific texts. Moscow: URSS Publ., 2010. (In Russian)

Chernyavskaya 2017 — Chernyavskaya V.E. Methodological opportunities of discourse analysis in corpus linguistics. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologiia. 2017, (50): 135–148. https://doi.org/10.17223/19986645/50/9 (In Russian)

Chernyavskaya 2018 — Chernyavskaya V.E. Discourse analysis and corpus approaches: a missing evidencebased link? Towards qualitative and quantitative approaches. Voprosy kognitivnoi lingvistiki. 2018, (2): 31–37. https://doi.org/10.20916/1812-3228-2018-2-31-37 (In Russian)

Clemen 1997 — Clemen G. The concept of hedging: Origins, approaches and definitions. In: Markkanen R., Schröder H. (eds). In: Hedging and Discourse. Approaches to the Analysis of a Pragmatic Phenomenon in Academic Texts. New York: Walter de Gruyter, 1997. P. 235–248.Crismore, Vande Kopple 1988 — Crismore A., Vande Kopple W. Reader’s learning from prose. The effect of hedges. Written communication. 1988, 5 (2): 184–202.

Dontcheva-Navratilova 2016 — Dontcheva-Navratilova O. Cross-Cultural Variation in the Use of Hedges and Boosters in Academic Discourse. Prague Journal of English Studies. 2016, 5 (1):163–184. https://doi.org/10.1515/pjes-2016-0009

Fomina 2013 — Fomina M.A. Markers of the addressee in a scientific dialogue. Linguocultural Education in the System of University Training. 2013, 2 (10): 96–103.

Gorina, Khrabrova 2017 — Gorina O.G., Khrabrova V.E. Linguistic hedging as a communicative strategy. Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ser.: Lingvistika i mezhkul’turnaia kommunikatsiia. 2017, 15 (3): 44–53. https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7935-2017-15-3-44-53 (In Russian)

Haufiku, Kangira 2018 — Haufiku N., Kangira J. An Exploration of Hedging and Boosting Devices Used in Academic Discourse Focusing on English Theses at the University of Namibia. Studies in English Language Teaching. 2018, 6 (1): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.22158/selt.v6n1p1

Holmes 1997 — Holmes R. Genre Analysis and the Social science: an Investigation of the Structure of Research Article Discussion Sections in Three Disciplines. English for Specific Purposes. 1997, (16): 321–337.

Hubler 1983 — Hubler A. Understatements and hedges in English. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: JohnBenjamin’s PC, 1983.

Hyland 1996 — Hyland K. Writing without conviction? Hedging in scientific research articles. Applied Linguistics. 1996, (17): 433–454.

Hyland 1998 — Hyland K. Hedging in Scientific Research Articles. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 1998.

Hyland 2005 — Hyland K. Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing. London: Continuum, 2005.

Lakoff 1973 — Lakoff J. The logic of politeness: Or, minding your p’s and q’s. In: Corum C. (ed.). Papers from the 9th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, 1973. P. 292–305.

Lancaster, Aull 2014 — Lancaster Z., Aull L. Linguistic Markers of Stance in Early and Advanced Academic

Writing: A Corpus-based Comparison. Written communication. 2014, 31 (2): 151–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088314527055

Martin 2001 — Martin P. Epistemic Modality in English and Spanish Psychological tests. Revista de lenguas para fines específicos. 2001, (8): 195–208.

Mikolaychik 2020 — Mikolaychik M.V. Lexical Hedging in English Abstracts of Russian Economics Research Articles: A Corpus-Based Study. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ser. 2. Iazykoznanie. 2020, 19 (5): 38–47. https://doi.org/10.15688/jvolsu2.2020.5.4 (In Russian)

Myers 1989 — Myers G. The pragmatics of politeness in scientific articles. Applied Linguistics. 1989, (10): 1–35.

Nefedov 2017 — Nefedov S. Restrictive Argumentation: Modal Words of Doubt And Shared Knowledge in Academic Linguistic Writings. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg State University. Language and Literature. 2017, 14 (4): 599–610. (In Russian)

Petchkij 2019 — Petchkij W. Explicit Teaching of Hedges: Bringing Hedging in Academic Writing into the Thai EFL Classroom. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching. 2019, 16 (1): 95–113.

Salager-Meyer 1994 — Salager-Meyer F. Hedges and textual communicative function in medical English written discourse. English for Specific Purpose. 1994, 13 (2): 149–170.

Shchemeleva 2013 — Shchemeleva I.Yu. In: Lexical means of hedging in Anglo-American academic discourse: theory and application in EAP. Communication in the modern multicultural world: ethnopsycholinguistic analysis. Moscow: Pearson, 2013. P. 320–330. (In Russian)

Takimoto 2015 — Takimoto M. A Corpus-Based Analysis of Hedges and Boosters in English Academic Articles. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics. 2015, 5 (1): 95–105. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v5i1.836

Temirbulatova 2017 — Temirbulatova A. S. Hedging as a pragmatic indicator of accuracy in a scientific text. Successes of Modern Science. 2017, 3 (4): 175–181. (In Russian)

Ustyantseva 2019 — Ustyantseva A.E. Hedging in academic writing. Issues of Applied Linguistics. 2019, (35): 82–98. https://doi.org/10.25076/vpl.35.05

Varttala 2001 — Varttala T. Hedging in Scientifically Oriented Discourse: Exploring Variatio. Tampere: University of Tampere, 2001.

Vassileva 2001 — Vassileva I. Commitment and detachment in English and Bulgarian academic writing. In: Duszak A.(ed.). Culture and styles of academic discourse. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2001. P. 81–103.