Nominal causal constructions: Causal chains and syncretism
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu09.2023.414Abstract
Nominal causal constructions can involve dedicated markers (we arrived late because of John) or syncretic markers that can also convey concrete meanings, such as source (die from alcohol), goal, path, instrument/comitative, etc. So far, these patterns of syncretism have been systematically analyzed only for a few European languages. Based on a grammar survey of a world-wide variety sample of 65 languages, I assembled an annotated dataset of 113 nominal causal constructions. My goal was to explore whether patterns of syncretism correlate with specific types of causal meanings. The dataset provides evidence showing that such correlation does exist. In particular, syncretic markers that normally denote instruments or locations favour contexts where the caused event is simultaneous with the causing event (tremble with fear), while syncretic markers that normally denote endoints of motion favour contexts where the causing event is associated with future-oriented components in the causal chain. Overall, nominal causes tend to be construed in terms of simpler cognitive schemas, and the use of respective markers iconically reflects the structure of the relevant causal chains. By contrast, dedicated causal markers favour the meaning of indirect causation that involves speaker’s subjective reasoning. Typologically, dedicated markers are less frequent than syncretic markers. In individual languages, they are often of secondary origin and diachronically unstable. Thus, typologically and cognitively, dedicated causal markers are peripheral for the causal semantic domain, despite the fact that they are important for the European logic-oriented linguistic tradition.
Keywords:
causal constructions, typology, case, syncretism, cognitive linguistics
Downloads
References
References
Abraham 1991 — Abraham E. Why ‘because’? The management of given/new Information as a constraint on the selection of causal alternatives. Text. 1991, 11 (3): 323–339.
Broadwell 2006 — Broadwell G. A Choctaw reference grammar. Lincoln; London: University of Nebraska Press, 2006.
Croft 1991 — Croft W. Syntactic categories and grammatical relations: The cognitive organization of information. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1991.
Croft 1993 — Croft W. Case marking and the semantics of mental verbs. In: Pustejovsky J. (ed.). Semantics and the lexicon. Studies in linguistics and philosophy, 49. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1993. P. 55–72.
Croft 2012 — Croft W. Verbs. Aspect and causal structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
Degand 2000 — Degand L. Causal connectives or causal prepositions? Discursive constraints. Journal of pragmatics. 2000, 32: 687–707.
Dirven 1995 — Dirven R. The construal of cause: The case of cause prepositions. In: Taylor J. R., MacLaury R. (eds). Language and the cognitive construal of the world. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 1995. P. 95–118.
Enfield 2007 — Enfield N. A Grammar of Lao. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2007.
Epps 2008 — Epps P. A grammar of Hup. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 2008.
Guillaume 2017 — Guillaume A. A Grammar of Cavineña. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 2017.
Haspelmath 1993 — Haspelmath M. A Grammar of Lezgian. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 1993.
Haspelmath 2014 — Haspelmath M. Arguments and adjuncts as language-particular syntactic categories and as comparative concepts. Linguistic Discovery. 2014, 12 (2): 3–11.
Heath 1999 — Heath J. A Grammar of Koyra Chiini: The Songhay of Timbuktu. Berlin; New York: De Gruyter Mouton, 1999.
Heine, Kuteva 2002 — Heine B., Kuteva T. World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
Hohulin, Hohulin 2014 — Hohulin E. L., Hohulin R. M. Tuwali Ifugao Dictionary and Grammar. Manila: Linguistic Society of the Philippines, 2014.
Hopper 1991 — Hopper P. On some principles of grammaticalization. In: Traugott E. C., Heine B. (eds). Approaches to grammaticalization. Vol. 1. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1991. P. 17–35.
Iordanskaia, Mel’chuk 1996 — Iordanskaia L. N., Mel’chuk I. A. Towards the semantics of Russian causal prepositions (IZ-ZA liubvi ~ OT liubvi ~ IZ liubvi ~ * S liubvi ~ PO liubvi). Moskovskii lingvisticheskii zhurnal. 1996, 2 (1): 162–211. (In Russian)
Ivić 1954 — Ivić M. Causal constructions with prepositions zbog, od, iz in the modern literary language. Naš jezik. 1954, 5–6: 186–194. (In Serbo-Croatian)
Kawasha 2003 — Kawasha B. K. Lunda Grammar: A morphosyntactic and semantic analysis. PhD dissertation. Oregon: University of Oregon, 2003.
Klangová 2017 — Klangová L. Expression of causal elations in Russian and Czech. PhD dissertation. Brno: Masarykova univerzita, 2017. (In Russian)
Kovačević 1988 — Kovačević M. Causal semantic field. Sarajevo: Svjetlost, 1988. (In Serbo-Croatian)
Krishnamurti, Gwynn 1985 — Krishnamurti Bh., Gwynn J. P. L. A grammar of modern Telugu. Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1985.
Lehmann 1995 — Lehmann Ch. Thoughts on grammaticalisation. München: Lincom Europa, 1995.
Levontina 2003 — Levontina I. B.: IZ-ZA 4, IZ 8.1, OT 6, colloquial PO I. 7, colloquial S I. 10, dated or bookish ZA II. 8, BLAGODARIa, bookish PO PRIChINE, bookish VSLEDSTVIE, non-colloquial V REZUL’’TATE, bureaucratic VVIDU, bookish V SILU ‘by the reason that’. In: Apresian Iu. D. et al.(eds). Novyi ob”iasnitel’nyi slovar’ russkogo iazyka. Moscow: Iazyki russkoi kul’tury Publ., 2003. P. 430–437. (In Russian)
Luraghi 2005 — Luraghi S. Paths of semantic extension. From cause to beneficiary and purpose. In: Fortescue M., Skafte Jensen E., Mogensen J. E., Schøsler L. (eds). Historical linguistics 2003. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2005. P. 141–157.
Narrog 2010 — Narrog H. A diachronic dimension in maps of case functions. Linguistic Discovery. 2010, 8 (1): 233–254.
Nichols 1986 — Nichols J. Head-marking and dependent-marking grammar. Language. 1986, 62 (1): 56–119.
Nordlinger 1998 — Nordlinger R. A grammar of Wambaya, Northern Territory (Australia). Canberra: Research school of Pacific and Asian studies, The Australian National University, 1998.
Palancar 2001 — Palancar E. Emergent markers: The relation of instruments, causes, and agents in grammatical constructions. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung. 2001, 54 (4): 365–384.
Radden 1985 — Radden G. Spatial metaphors underlying prepositions of causality. In: Paprotté W., Dirven R. (eds). The ubiquity of metaphor. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1985. P. 177–207.
Say 2021 — Say S. Nominal causal constructions across Slavic: Semantic contrasts in a parallel corpus perspective. Slavia. 2021, 90 (2): 182–201.
Schrock 2014 — Schrock T. B. A grammar of Ik (Icé-tód), Northeast Uganda’s last thriving Kuliak language. PhD dissertation. Utrecht: LOT, 2014.
Say et al. 2022– — Say S., Logvinova N., Zabelina E., Zaika N. (eds). NoCaCoDa: Typological database of nominal causal constructions. St. Petersburg: Institute for Linguistic Studies of the RAS Publ., 2022–.Available at: https://nocacoda.info (accessed: 13.06.2023).
Shimelman 2017 — Shimelman A. A grammar of Yauyos Quechua. Berlin: Language Science Press, 2017.
Talmy 1976 — Talmy L. Semantic causative types. In: Shibatani M. (ed.). The grammar of causative constructions. New York: Academic Press, 1976. P. 43–116.
Valiulytė 1998 — Valiulytė E. Syntactic synonyms in the modern Lithuanian language. Circumstances of place, time and reason. Vilnius: Mokslo ir enciklopedijų leidybos institutas, 1998. (In Lithuanian)
Verhoeven 2007 — Verhoeven E. Experiential constructions in Yucatec Maya: A typologically based analysis of a functional domain in a Mayan language. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2007.
Yamaguchi 2004 — Yamaguchi K. A typological, historical and functional study of adpositions in the languages of the world. PhD Dissertation. Albuquerque: University of Albuquerque, 2004.
Zaika 2019 — Zaika N. M. Polypredicative causal constructions in the languages of the world: THe space of typological possibilities. Voprosy iazykoznaniia. 2019, 4: 7–32. (In Russian)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Articles of "Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Language and Literature" are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.
